The Debate over firearms

The Debate over firearms

The debate over firearms ended, or didn’t the “March for our Lives” crowd, get that? They might however be a little late to the party.

All debate was settled with the inclusion of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution. I will submit, these folks are purposely ignoring the words “shall not be infringed.”

What it is that they really want to debate is my freedom to own firearms in the first place. Their semantic gestures at debate are laughable. What they desire is no firearms privately owned.

I am not even going into what governments have done to disarmed citizens. Suffice it to say, “it sucked for them.”

These people, “the marchers’” I mean, are awfully willing to gamble with my life; that our government will not turn dictatorial and violent. Reckon that depends on how much your government trusts you.

Gene Barker

Forks, WA